CVE-2008-5031

Loading...

General

Score:10.0/10.0
Severity:High
Category:Numeric Error

Impact Metrics

Confidentiality:Complete
Integrity:Complete
Availability:Complete

Exploitability Metrics

Access Vector:Network
Access Complexity:Low
Authentication:None

Relative vulnerabilities

CVE-2006-1861, CVE-2006-3467, CVE-2007-1351, CVE-2007-1352, CVE-2007-1667, CVE-2007-2052, CVE-2007-4565, CVE-2007-4965, CVE-2007-5333, CVE-2007-5342, CVE-2007-5461, CVE-2007-5966, CVE-2007-6286, CVE-2008-0002, CVE-2008-1232, CVE-2008-1377, CVE-2008-1379, CVE-2008-1679, CVE-2008-1721, CVE-2008-1806, CVE-2008-1807, CVE-2008-1808, CVE-2008-1887, CVE-2008-1927, CVE-2008-1947, CVE-2008-2315, CVE-2008-2316, CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, CVE-2008-2362, CVE-2008-2370, CVE-2008-2379, CVE-2008-2711, CVE-2008-3142, CVE-2008-3143, CVE-2008-3144, CVE-2008-3528, CVE-2008-3663, CVE-2008-4307, CVE-2008-4864, CVE-2008-5050, CVE-2008-5183, CVE-2008-5314, CVE-2008-5515, CVE-2008-5700, CVE-2009-0009, CVE-2009-0011, CVE-2009-0012, CVE-2009-0013, CVE-2009-0014, CVE-2009-0015, CVE-2009-0017, CVE-2009-0018, CVE-2009-0019, CVE-2009-0020, CVE-2009-0028, CVE-2009-0033, CVE-2009-0137, CVE-2009-0138, CVE-2009-0139, CVE-2009-0140, CVE-2009-0141, CVE-2009-0142, CVE-2009-0159, CVE-2009-0269, CVE-2009-0322, CVE-2009-0580, CVE-2009-0675, CVE-2009-0676, CVE-2009-0696, CVE-2009-0745, CVE-2009-0746, CVE-2009-0747, CVE-2009-0748, CVE-2009-0778, CVE-2009-0781, CVE-2009-0783, CVE-2009-0787, CVE-2009-0834, CVE-2009-1072, CVE-2009-1093, CVE-2009-1094, CVE-2009-1095, CVE-2009-1096, CVE-2009-1097, CVE-2009-1098, CVE-2009-1099, CVE-2009-1100, CVE-2009-1101, CVE-2009-1102, CVE-2009-1103, CVE-2009-1104, CVE-2009-1105, CVE-2009-1106, CVE-2009-1107, CVE-2009-1192, CVE-2009-1252, CVE-2009-1336, CVE-2009-1337, CVE-2009-1385, CVE-2009-1388, CVE-2009-1389, CVE-2009-1439, CVE-2009-1630, CVE-2009-1633, CVE-2009-1895, CVE-2009-2406, CVE-2009-2407, CVE-2009-2414, CVE-2009-2416, CVE-2009-2417, CVE-2009-2625, CVE-2009-2670, CVE-2009-2671, CVE-2009-2672, CVE-2009-2673, CVE-2009-2675, CVE-2009-2676, CVE-2009-2692, CVE-2009-2698, CVE-2009-2716, CVE-2009-2718, CVE-2009-2719, CVE-2009-2720, CVE-2009-2721, CVE-2009-2722, CVE-2009-2723, CVE-2009-2724, CVE-2009-2730, CVE-2009-2847, CVE-2009-2848

Published on 10/11/08 - Updated on 11/10/18

Description

Multiple integer overflows in Python 2.2.3 through 2.5.1, and 2.6, allow context-dependent attackers to have an unknown impact via a large integer value in the tabsize argument to the expandtabs method, as implemented by (1) the string_expandtabs function in Objects/stringobject.c and (2) the unicode_expandtabs function in Objects/unicodeobject.c. NOTE: this vulnerability reportedly exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2008-2315.

Category: Numeric Error

CWE-189 (Numeric Errors)
Weaknesses in this category are related to improper calculation or conversion of numbers.

Security Notices

US National Vulnerability DatabaseCVE-2008-5031
Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'Information CERTA-2009-AVI-068, CERTA-2009-AVI-513
CentOS CESA-2009:1176
Redhat RHSA-2009:1176
Renater 2009/VULN046, 2009/VULN470, 2010/VULN104

Exploits

No exploits available for this CVE in our database.

Relative technologies

VendorProduct
pythonpython

Share this vulnerability with:

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Mail